Petestack Blog

21 June 2011

What price ‘improvement’?

Filed under: Running — admin @ 11:55 pm

Another West Highland Way Race (my third and last as a competitor!), another mixed experience and another style of report to set alongside 2007’s dual-perspective runner’s/support crew narratives and 2010’s bullet-point summary

Now, this was the race that wasn’t supposed to be (with 2010 my sole serious attempt to go sub-20 hours) but allowed to happen on the assumption (maybe presumption!) that I could still run sub-20, was going to and basically had to to justify the obsessional effort and sustained sacrifice (not much climbing done this winter after juggling WHW training with WML preparation!) required to get there. So why am I apparently happy with a new (5 min) PB of 20:44:26 when I should be gutted to miss the big target and the effort that’s gone into this year’s marginal improvement doesn’t even begin to compute?

Well (for a start), it doesn’t have to ‘compute’. So it might have been (was!) obsessional and sustained enough to stop me doing much else and might even have cost (at a quick guestimate) an hour’s training per second improvement, but scoring it purely on those terms can only belittle so many independently worthwhile days and evenings (things that bring me alive regardless of ‘purpose’) spent on hill and trail. What’s more, it’s the absurdity of this training/improvement ratio that ultimately brings (rather than denies) satisfaction with the achievement and the acceptance (knowing I’m still wide of the mark despite my best shape and strategy ever) that was still eluding me after last year’s race. You might think me defeatist for conceding an element of wishful thinking and abandoning the quest now but, with three finishes from three starts (2007, 2010 and 2011, and each quicker than the last), Saturday’s race completed in pretty good shape (no blistered soles, trashed quads/hams etc.) bar the tibialis anterior tendon sheath inflammation (nope, I hadn’t heard of it either!) that’s kept me off work for the first time on a post-race Monday (+ Tuesday!) and no evidence whatsoever to suggest I’m capable of going much faster, it’s time to call it a day as a competitor in this race.

So what about this ‘best shape and strategy ever’? Taking the shape as read (best training/taper, most miles and fewest niggles, with only last week’s cold really messing things up at all) and concentrating on the strategy, my even-paced 12-minute miling (no partying on the hills!) was spot-on in taking me a long way on fresh legs and proving that I’d learned not to spoil previous steady starts with the kind of romps over Conic Hill and up Loch Lomondside that bite back 50 miles later. Might add that, in also managing to follow another of my golden rules (don’t sit down… and I never did!) from start to finish, it was never my legs that were the problem (with only the increasing discomfort at the base of my right shin a concern) when they’ve more often than not been the limiting factor before. Since it wasn’t my heart or lungs (neither of which were ever stressed) either, that pretty well just leaves my head and stomach, and here’s where things start getting more difficult to assess. You’d think your head should be able to keep pushing you along fine when legs, heart and lungs all seem to be going well, but it’s just not that simple. So I wasn’t surprised to drop off the 12-minute pace for a bit north of Inversnaid with the most tortuous section of the course made slow and slippery by conditions otherwise suiting me much better than the 2011 Fling/2010 WHW heat, but more at a loss to explain why I couldn’t get back on it through Beinglas and beyond (Angus sounded so disappointed when I phoned him my time) when experience told me I should have been able to maintain it most of the way. But sometimes you just can’t maintain voluntary control of your head… you might think ‘mind over matter’ and all that and assume that finding the pace many hours later to cover the final 3.5 miles down Glen Nevis in just over half an hour equates to holding back too much earlier, but take note of Matt Fitzgerald’s words in Brain Training for Runners, where he says ‘the fact that exercise fatigue is brain-centered rather than muscle-based does not make it any less real or any more surmountable by willpower.’ So it’s not necessarily a sign of mental weakness to find yourself struggling (as I did) to maintain 13- to 14-minute miles when you’re convinced you should be doing 12s and yet be able to pull those 7s, 8s and 9s out of the bag with the end in sight (Fitzgerald’s ‘end spurt phenomenon’). As for my stomach, ultra hydration/nutrition is never easy but, with Angus’s records showing me to have been maintaining as steady an input as reasonable, some occasional inability to keep taking more on is no more or less than you’d expect… although whether I could forgive anyone but my brother, three-times support crew and companion on many, many adventures for feeding me hot Accelerade some 60 or 70 miles up the course is another matter!

Some bad patches to report where at one point I’d (delusionally!) seen myself serenely 12-minute miling up the course without any, but nothing especially grim by ultra standards with one slight ‘can’t eat or drink’ queasy spell somewhere I can’t quite remember and a series of minor mishaps (spontaneously bleeding nose, falling asleep on my feet after a mere 20 minutes’ in-car kip since Friday morning and a tortuously slow walking climb from Ba Bridge) between Forest Lodge and Glencoe about the worst of it. Some moments shared with friends whose plans were unfolding with varying degrees of success including Keith Hughes (on his way to a PB) early on, Gav McKinlay at Beinglas (surprised to catch him there, but happy to see him finishing strongly later) and John Kynaston not much further north (in a bright green top and about to become embroiled in a unpredictably prolonged battle to the finish). Then a surprisingly tired-looking Mike Raffan, who caught me again later in time to start playing leapfrog (along with Neil Rutherford) through Glencoe Ski Centre and Kings House, and a succession of encounters up to and through the Lairig Mor with Ross Moreland (‘no, Ross, I’m not showboating on home ground when I should be going much faster and I don’t care if I get beaten by a ginger!’), Ali Bryan-Jones and Drew Sheffield… with Ali and Drew nearly paying the price (quote, ‘there’s some guy catching us up’) for waltzing past in my own backyard when a mere 50 seconds separated the three of us at the end (not to mention Craig Stewart, who I don’t remember seeing, just another 119 seconds ahead of Drew) after my second- or third-wind, bringing-back-the-nosebleed, Glen Nevis sprint!

So what’s left after all that? The usual inadequate but heartfelt thanks to my indispensible support crew of Angus, Jon (who finally got to join me at Lundavra after being told I was still too fast at Kinloch!) and Eileen, and same to the whole race team and everybody involved. Congrats to Richie and Jan-Albert for the sharp-end battle that once again left me four hours adrift at the final checkpoint, to Thomas for his stunning PB in 4th place and to Kate, Sharon and Debs for a ladies’ battle of equal class. So perhaps I might have hoped to beat all the girls till I heard Kate was running, but now also concede Sharon (who by all accounts gave Kate the fright/fight of her life) and Debs (who told me at the start she was going to whip my ass… and did!) to have been out of my league (PS you’re a warrior, Debs). As for me, think things went well enough even if we could argue that I was found wanting in the end… it’s so easy to say you’re targeting sub-20 (or whatever), it’s non-negotiable and nothing else will do, but so hard to actually go get it. And hard to be sorry when I managed to salvage both sub-21 and the PB with that kick all the way down Glen Nevis (what a buzz that was)… not to mention the small bonus of later realising that I’d got (just) within 5 hours of Jez’s record! So I’m done with competing in this race and comfortable with that where I wasn’t last time. But of course there are other things to go for… not sure they’ll necessarily be racing when I’m wanting to get back to climbing, sailing (incuding yacht racing, yes!), the big hill rounds and running for the sheer joy of it rather than because I have to (please, I’m just a guy who likes running!), but we’ll see.

All photos © Angus Duggan

11 Comments

  1. Pete, you sum it up pretty well when you say that during the race your legs feel ok, your breathing’s comfortable, but for some reason you’re just not going as fast as you feel you should be. I think it’s the timescales involved in this race that completely scupper any pace plan as there are so many variables, and the runners mindset is probably the biggest single factor.

    You looked strong when you powered past me and your run might not be a sub-20, but you have a Ramsay Round under your belt and having seen you do it I’m 100% certain that not many sub-20 hour WHW runners could manage that.

    I too plan to enjoy my retirement from running the race, tackling new challanges, but hope to keep some sort of involvement with it in some way, it’s too dear to walk away from completely. Take it easy :)

    Comment by Gav McKinlay — 22 June 2011 @ 1:47 am

  2. When I saw you coming in smiling even though it was not a sub-20 and remembered how you looked last year, I was very pleased for you. So well done and enjoy your “retirement”! Silke

    Comment by Silke — 22 June 2011 @ 8:46 am

  3. I’m so sorry I missed you at the start. I had hoped to see you en route but Debs was running like a rocket. She whipped a lot of asses!!

    Fab report, I’m so pleased you weren’t disappointed with your time. 3 starts and 3 finishes and a PB each time is an amazing achievement. Good to retire on a high!

    I hope you’re keeping a record of the hugs I owe you. Might just need to come up specially for a hugathon.

    Here’s to retirement

    Ali xxx

    Comment by Allybea — 22 June 2011 @ 9:34 am

  4. Great repoprt Peter and an excellent run.

    I’m really pleased that you’re not disappointed at not getting the sub 20. We’ve shared three races together and you’ve finished well aheasd of me in all three! It’s just a shame (for me) that you weren’t there for my best two!!

    Please keep in touch and keep us all on our toes.

    PS … I’d love to come sailing one day with you so if you ever need a crew let me know!

    Comment by John Kynaston — 22 June 2011 @ 11:24 am

  5. Well, you got your weather and got your finish but, sadly, not your time. I wondered about the nose bleed at the finish. Thought it may have been one of the marshalls who had to suffer your weather for 21 hours.
    Enjoy your retirement, but I’ll add you to my list of “I’ll believe it when I see its” that started when I supported Jim Robertson in 2008. He said it again on Saturday morning!

    Davie

    Comment by Davie — 22 June 2011 @ 11:32 am

  6. Hi Pete, great report and it was good to run with you for a bit in your own backyard. Your fast finish through Glen Nevis was impressive – I wasn’t expecting to see you again after the Lairig. Having you pushing me along over the last half a mile helped me get a better time and more importantly made it pass much quicker than it otherwise would have done, which was a relief (I was hurting bad by then).

    Ali

    P.S. I have a route round all of the Glencoe Munros that I’d like to do one day, hopefully in August / September – fancy it?

    Comment by Ali Bryan-Jones — 22 June 2011 @ 1:32 pm

  7. Some interesting comments to respond to, folks…

    @Gav, AFAIK there are nine dual finishers of Ramsay’s Round and the WHW Race, being (assuming the P Simpson from WHWR 1989 is the Pete Simpson with a 1990 RR and the J Scott from WHWR 1989 is not the Jo Scott with a 2011 RR) Pete Simpson, Mike Hartley, Adrian Davis, Carl Pryce, Mick James, Olly Stephenson, Jamie Thin, Alan Lucker and myself. But, with most clearly quicker on the WHWR than RR, one about the same and one actually slower, there’s no obvious correlation between times there.

    @Silke, Ali B and John, thanks. It’s not so much that I’m not disappointed at all as that my disappointment at the missed target was quickly (yes, before I’d even finished!) overtaken by a more holistic (maybe pragmatic?) view of the whole experience. And, since ‘retiring’ from this race doesn’t mean I’m giving up running (who, me?) or you’re never going to see me again, count me in for the hugathons, sailing and all the rest!

    @Davie, but I’m not Jim Robertson and I’ve never said I’m nailing my shoes to the wall! So I’ve currently got entries for ’10 in the Glen’ (participation subject to flaming tendon recovery) and the Ben Race + plenty of other half-baked plans, but you’ll just not see me competing in WHW Race again when I’ve no interest in simply grinding out sub-35 finishes, the sub-20’s probably a 1:10 chance for me and you’d need to convince me it was 9:10 to put myself through all of that again.

    @Ali B-J, so glad it was you I got to share some of the closing stages with! And could well be up for Glen Coe (got Ben Race 3 September, maybe the Coll Half-Marathon 20 August, but think I’m otherwise OK), on which note would be interested to know the route you had in mind and wonder if you’ve seen mine from 2006 (NB calculated distance & ascent predate Forerunner ownership)?
    http://www.petestack.com/running/glencoe.html

    Comment by admin — 22 June 2011 @ 9:26 pm

  8. Well done again Pete, and a super report. You’re far too young to feel that this race has had its best out of you yet. My prediction is that you’ll think again eventually and we’ll see you back on the start line in around 2014….

    Comment by Andy Cole — 22 June 2011 @ 11:25 pm

  9. Well done on another impressive finish even if it was not quite what you planned. I really liked your ideas about pacing. Great report too. Caroline

    Comment by Caroline — 23 June 2011 @ 4:57 pm

  10. Hard work in training but it did not quite pay I would say. I suggested in my blog that your training was too much hill quality, probably “overtraining” the hills since the WHW Race has a high percentage of flat running altogether. Or running with easy gradient. I know a couple of guys who did a decent Bob Graham but did not perform well on the WHW Race but they all admitted that the races are so much different. I know it is not a clear cut but I would say your great long distance hill running skills (Ramsey Round) are probably not in balance with your flat running skills.

    Apart from that that little health issue you had just a few days before the race could very much have had a considerable impact on your performance. I know that from my own experience.

    Anyway, still a great performance and it certainly looked like a much healthier finish compared to last year.

    Comment by Thomas — 23 June 2011 @ 11:25 pm

  11. Some more personal replies here for you good people…

    @Andy, sure you know how much I respect your take on things, so prepared to concede your ‘eventually’ prediction possible but highly unlikely (meaning not a snowball’s for the foreseeable and there’d need to be a really compelling reason to ever tempt me back) while stressing that never probably still means never.

    @Caroline, thanks, and hoping that both you and Neal find what you seek in next year’s race and beyond.

    @Thomas, well, that’s a tricky one… did it pay or not? Quoting the meat of my reply to your comment on your own blog to say that ‘perceptions of my training load may be skewed because 1. I blog most of my true hill runs but few of my more regular/routine trail runs (or, dare I say it, less frequent road runs), and 2. there’s nothing flat to run round here anyway.’ To which I might add (perhaps bizarrely when we’d all like to be faster!) that I’m just not a ‘flat’ runner, know what I like and don’t particularly regret any ‘imbalance’ in my skills when (as stated in my report) I’m ultimately ‘just a guy who likes running!’ As for ‘that little health issue’ (possibly the cause of my nosebleeds and still lurking faintly now), for sure I’ve thought about that but we’ll never know and it’s always a risk to be factored into the odds I’ve suggested in my response to Davie. So I’m still comfortable with saying that’s it re. the full WHW Race, but must say I fancy the Devil sometime and think that might suit me (just let me get at all that hilly, home-ground trail while I’m still fresh enough to murder it)! ;-)

    Comment by admin — 24 June 2011 @ 12:21 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Blog powered by WordPress. Feedback to webmaster@petestack.com.